Evaluation criterion | No | Rather no than yes | More or less | Rather yes than no | Yes |

The paper is well readable | |||||

Language used in the paper is correct | |||||

The paper is logical and well structured | |||||

The general typeset of the paper is correct | |||||

The paper was interesting to read | |||||

The paper gives a good overview of the topic | |||||

The material in the paper is mathematically correct | |||||

References to the external sources are presented correctly | |||||

All the relevant references are present | |||||

The formulae are typed correctly |

Answer the following questions in free text.

- How to evaluate the selection of the topic?
- How to evaluate general presentation style?
- How to evaluate the selection of the information given in the paper?
- How to evaluate typesetting of the paper?
- What was new and interesting to me in the paper?
- What else would I have liked to read?

- The paper has the following misprints:
- The paper has the following mistakes in wording and style:
- The paper has the following mathematical mistakes:
- The paper has the following mistakes in typesetting:
- The paper will be more readable if the author makes the following changes:

- The paper misses the following elements (topics, references, figures, proof steps, etc.):
- The following elements could be removed from the paper:
- Other comments: