PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES SEMINAR

Referee name   :
Referee e-mail :

--------------------------------------------------------------

REFEREED PAPER
Author  :
Title   :

OVERALL MARK  (1-5)    :

The defult marking scale is 1-5 (5 highest positive, 1 "fail").
Some items may have additional explanations when to use which marks.
If there is a comment field, please add a short explananation of your
mark (1-2 sentences).

TITLE (1-5)     :
[Is the title clear and succinct describing the subject of the paper?]
COMMENT:

STRUCTURE (1-5)  :
[Does the paper have all required components; is the main text
suitably structured?]
COMMENT:

ABSTRACT (1-5)     :
[Is the abstract generally understandable; does it fulfill its purpose?]
COMMENT:

INTRODUCTION (1-5) :
[Does the introduction give an adequate overview, motivation, problem
description, etc?]
COMMENT:

REFERENCES (1-5):
[Is the bibliography accurate and up-to-date; are all references
referred somewhere in the text; etc?]
COMMENT:


ACCESSIBILITY (1-5)     :
   5 - is accessible only for a specialist in the given specific area
   4 - is accessible for a person having a good general overview in the area
   3 - understandable for any CS/IT master student interested on Prog.Languages
   2 - understandable for any CS/IT student
   1 - understandable for general audience

READABILITY (1-5)     :
   5: very good
   4: basically well written
   3: readable
   2: poor, needs considerable work
   1: unacceptably bad


DENSITY (1-5)     :
[Is the length of the paper suitable for the content; or is the paper
too light-weight (eg. 20 pages where 2 would be enough); or too tensly
"packed" (too much materila for the given length)]
COMMENT:

LANGUAGE (1-5):
COMMENT:

--------------------------------------------------------------

REFEREE

COMPETENCE (1-5) :
   5 - expert (eg. I have written a paper in similar topic)
   4 - well informed (eg. I had participated in lectures/seminars on a similar topic)
   3 - moderately familiar (eg. I have read a paper in a similar topic)
   2 - informed outsider (eg. I have a basic knowledge in the general area)
   1 - stranger (eg. the topic is completely alien to me)

CONFIDENCE (1-5)  :
   5 - I'm completely sure that all given marks are fair and correct
   3 - I'm quite sure that most marks are fair and correct
   1 - I wish and hope that my marks are fairer than tossing a coin

TIME SPENT (in hours): 

UNDERSTANDING (1-5)   :
   5 - all details were clair and understandable
   3 - understood the main idea, but not all details
   1 - couldn't understand almost anything

--------------------------------------------------------------

REFEREE REPORT

Short overview of the paper (one/two paragraphs about the content;
doesn't give an evaluation, but demonstrates your understanding of the
paper).

A general assessment of the paper, pointing out positive and negative
aspects.

Concrete recommendations for improvments (incl. minimal requirements
for the final version).

Other comments.