Quantum Attacks on Classical Proof Systems - The Hardness of Quantum Rewinding

Andris Ambainis, Ansis Rosmanis, and Dominique Unruh.
September 2014. Talk at QCrypt 2014. Regular paper: Quantum Attacks on Classical Proof Systems (The Hardness of Quantum Rewinding) by Ambainis, Rosmanis, and Unruh.

Abstract

Quantum zero-knowledge proofs and quantum proofs of knowledge are inherently difficult to analyze because their security analysis uses rewinding. Certain cases of quantum rewinding are handled by the results by Watrous (SIAM J Comput, 2009) and Unruh (Eurocrypt 2012), yet in general the problem remains elusive. We show that this is not only due to a lack of proof techniques: relative to an oracle, we show that classically secure proofs and proofs of knowledge are insecure in the quantum setting.

More specifically, sigma-protocols, the Fiat-Shamir construction, and Fischlin's proof system are quantum insecure under assumptions that are sufficient for classical security. Additionally, we show that for similar reasons, computationally binding commitments provide almost no security guarantees in a quantum setting.

To show these results, we develop the "pick-one trick", a general technique that allows an adversary to find one value satisfying a given predicate, but not two.

Files available online

This publication is accompanied by links to downloadable versions of this publication. These documents do not necessarily correspond exactly to the cited version. Instead, in most cases full, updated or preliminary versions are provided.

Slides used in my talks are available upon personal request, as long as you agree not to disseminate them to a wider audience or make them available online. If in doubt, please ask.